Year A Lent 2: born again

The thing about being born is that it is less of an event than a process. We might put a time on the birth of a baby, but the minutes and seconds may seem arbitrary after hours or even days of labour, after stages and ages of waiting and worrying and breathing and hold-it-now…  And everybody here has been through that process, one way or another, whether aided by a midwife or a skilled surgeon or a very surprised stranger (it happens); every person here has experienced birth. Most of us don’t remember it happening to us, although some of us remember it happening to our children. But can you imagine what it was like, waiting in the dark, wondering what was happening to that ocean in which we had lived and moved and had our being, which had become suddenly stormy, wracked with waves and currents, light becoming stronger, familiar voices calling us out and the shock of that first breath of air?

Birth is risky; there are those of us here who know close-up how dangerous it can be even to attempt to be born. I know, by the way, I am certain after many and prolonged conversations with God about the matter that those babies who were lost to us were never lost to God, never at a loss for life, and that we will see them, and know them in love, when we see God face to face. I am sure of that.

Birth is unpredictable; like the coming of the Son of Man, no one knows the day or the hour, even if they book the operating room in advance, sometimes Mother Nature has other ideas than the expectant mother with child.

We think we know what we mean when we talk about being “born again” – the NRSV renders it, “born from above,” but almost any other Bible that you pick up will say that Jesus said, “You must be born again.” But Jesus was rarely glib, and he knew what it meant, how complicated and dangerous and unpredictable being born can be. Nicodemus struggled to hear him; he was not quite ready yet; but we see him labouring through the Gospel to be reborn, out of water and with the Holy Spirit, to enter that new life, that new light of the kingdom of God, that Jesus offered to him.

Nicodemus came to Jesus by night, because he was a teacher of the Jews, and a Pharisee, and the Pharisees as a group had a somewhat tense relationship with Jesus and his disciples. They tended to view him with suspicion, or at least caution. Some, it is true, invited him to dinner. But most probably kept their distance. Nicodemus was curious about Jesus, but he was also afraid of what his friends would think if they saw him consulting this strange new prophet and miracle man. So he set out in the middle of the night – a popular time for a labour to begin – and sought out Jesus in the dark. You might set down their conversation that night as the beginning of the labour contractions for Nicodemus.

Another contraction is recorded in John 7. Jesus had gone up to the Feast of the Tabernacles in Jerusalem, and began to teach in the temple. Some of the people began to whisper that he was the Messiah; others wanted to lay hands on him and arrest him, or worse, for stirring up such rumours. The chief priests and the Pharisees finally asked the temple guards, “Why didn’t you arrest him?” The guards said, “We’d never heard anything like this!” The Pharisees told them not to be taken in by Jesus’ teaching or presence or person, “No one who is anyone believes in him, only the mob, the little people, the unimportant people,” they pronounced. They disparaged Jesus and judged him, but Nicodemus must have felt a twinge, a squeeze, because suddenly he found the courage he had lacked in the night time. “Is this what we do, to condemn a man out of turn without hearing him first?” he asked them, and they scorned Nicodemus, as he had feared that they would, but he was one step closer to new life.

The third and last time that we meet Nicodemus is towards the end, in John 19, after the arrest, after the trial, after the death on the cross. Joseph of Arimathea, who had also been secretly following Jesus, but not wanting to make his allegiance known to his fellow Pharisees, did penance by going out and asking Pilate for the body, so that he could honour Jesus publicly in his death as he had failed to in his life. Nicodemus went with him, carrying a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about a hundred pounds in weight. Nicodemus must have thought himself stillborn, to give over so much of his wealth to be sealed in the tomb with a dead man. But it was not over yet, and Nicodemus was yet to take his first breath in the shock of realization of a new life.

Nicodemus’ second birth was the product of a long labour; it was a process of coming out punctuated by moments of stress and confusion. His emergence into the light, bathed in water and the Spirit, would not be completed until after the Resurrection; David Rensberger (Johannine Faith and Liberating Community (The Westminster Press, 1988), 37-41) argues that Nicodemus and Joseph represent a group whose faith and courage would never be sufficient to won Jesus as the Christ, who would remain outside of the community of true believers. True, Jesus told them, “No one can see the kingdom of God without being born again,” but he also said that God loved the world so much that he sent his Son not to condemn it, but to save it. No one is lost to God. Not me, not you, not Nicodemus. Just as Paul describes Abraham’s labour to become the father of his people in his letter to the Romans, Nicodemus’ labour would be completed “in the presence of the God in whom he believed, who gives life to the dead and calls into existence the things that do not exist.”

I think that one of the reasons that we try to reduce the idea of being born again to a single experience or moment is that it is easier than seeing our lives as labour. I am sure that those moments and experiences matter massively – they are contractions that make us gasp and know that something real is happening – but some labours are less dramatic, and some require more help – I don’t want to push the metaphor beyond breaking point. After all, getting born is not an end in itself, but the gateway to a new way of living.

It is risky, being born anew, emerging into a new life which we have not yet seen, which we do not control. We don’t do well with unknowing – we hate not knowing what has happened, what will happen. Sometimes we hate it even more than the certainty of death. We do not do well with suspense, and being born is full of suspense.

It used to be that the first question after birth would be, “boy or girl?”; these days these things are more often known ahead of time, but still I think that the question of identity: who will we be? What gifts have we to offer? Whom will we love? – those questions are some of the big ones that hold us back from really giving ourselves over to the labour of new birth, because with it comes a whole new life to live into. We are used to the messy mix of saint and sinner, the angels and devils that we know. Why change?

But the possibilities of new life are just too good to ignore. The ability to live as those born of the Spirit, as well as water and the flesh. The chance for a life washed clean, with infinite and eternal possibilities.

So I invite you as this Lent winds on to pay attention to where the Spirit moves, like the wind, as she will. Those places where you feel that pressure to move closer to God, to become more involved, to stand up for Jesus in unexpected places; those are the contractions that move us towards new birth.

Pay attention, too, in the life of the parish: where are we as a community feeling that push, that impulse to something new, to something good, to something life-giving? Those, too, are contractions, moving Epiphany towards new birth.

Being born again is not a one-off, momentary, unrecoverable event. It is a process, and it is a gateway. It is a process that we can enter into and be a willing partner in. And it is a labour of love:

“For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son [to be born into it], so that everyone who believes in him may never perish but have eternal life.”

We, who once were nothing, are born into being not once, not even twice, but eternally, fearfully, wonderfully, and we, each of us, and even those whom we never saw, are completed “in the presence of the God in whom we believe, who gives life to the dead and calls into existence the things that do not exist.”

In the name of Jesus Christ, born and reborn in resurrection for us. Amen.

Posted in sermon | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Born again

There are no shadows at high noon, or at night,
but Nicodemus’ brother is crepuscular, sneaking
out in the gray dusk and slinking home at dawn.
You will know him by his eyes, blood-red,
searching, wildly, for the womb,
the last time he felt warm and beloved;
he is too old now for such soothing, being
born again of whisky and other spirits.

* updated Sunday, March 16, 2014

Posted in lectionary reflection, poetry, sermon preparation | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ash Wednesday : heart-rending, heart-mending

“Return to me with all your heart, with fasting, with weeping, and with mourning; rend your hearts and not your clothing,” says the prophet.

Rend your hearts: “a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise,” says the Psalmist.

A broken and contrite heart you will not despise. “We entreat you on behalf of Christ,” then, “be reconciled to God,” says Saint Paul.

Be reconciled to God: the lesson of Lent. Return to God with all your heart, with fasting, with weeping, with mourning. Rend your hearts.

Yet it seems strange. It makes for some head-scratching, the notion that reconciliation with God comes through a broken heart, through dust and ashes, symbols of death rather than life. Isn’t it rather healing that we are looking for; health and wholeness and life abundant? It seems almost counter-productive to gather the people to a solemn assembly, a feast before the Lord, in order to proclaim a fast. And then, in a crowning irony, once we are all here, gathered to pray, Jesus tells us to go and hide in our rooms and close our doors and pray to God in secret.

Martin L. Smith, in a very prayerful book, writes that the reason that Jesus gave this strange instruction to his disciples, men and women who probably found it quite difficult to secure a private place to pray, was to emphasize the whole-heartedness of prayer. Smith says,

 Jesus could have recommended his followers to go on praying in public as before, but to suppress all outward signs of being at prayer. ‘When you pray, make it appear to those around you as though you were merely carrying on your everyday business.’… Isn’t this, after all, just what many of us try to do?  We pray ‘in our heads’ while keeping up the appearance of merely walking the dog or of being lost in the usual reverie of subway passengers.[1]

What Smith doesn’t say bluntly, but could, is that we tend to pray whilst trying not to look ‘weird,’ or ‘different,’ fanatical,’ or, let’s face it, religious.

Fair enough. Because as long as we are worrying about what other people are thinking, we are not giving our full attention to God. We are praying, we are trying, we are learning, we are grasping at straws, but we are not taking whole-hearted gulps of God-air, of devoted, reconciling, one-with-God prayer.

So, in order to pray with our whole hearts, bodies, minds, spirits, with all our strength and soul, we need to develop the practice of private prayer. Jesus, remember, used to sneak away by himself when he needed a time of prayer, a time to reconcile, to know himself one with God. Smith, again:

 Prayer in private is prayer which can give God undivided attention and in which we can be wholly ourselves without the inhibitions imposed by the presence of others. Unobserved and free from the fear of interruption, there is no need to behave as if we were actually engaged in something other than prayer. If we cry the tears may flow without disconcerting others or arousing their curiosity.[2]

In private, with only God to see us face to face, we may rend our hearts without shame, or distraction, or reserve.

Our hearts, let’s face it, are already broken. We know our sin; we know our own wounds; we know the hearts that we ourselves have broken. We may hide them from one another, washing our faces and blotting our eyes and walking tall, putting on a brave face, but behind closed doors, God waits to hear the whole truth, the true story of our lives; waits to heal our broken hearts, if only we will place them in God’s hands. And, Jesus tells us, God will richly reward us.

The Reverend C. Eric Funston, Rector of St Paul’s Episcopal Church, Medina, writing about friendship with God on his blog on Monday quoted the writer Anais Nin:

“Each friend represents a world in us, a world possibly not born until they arrive, and it is only by this meeting that a new world is born.”[3]

What greater reward could there be than to know God as a true friend, and to build a new world, a new life together? What better new world than one in which we are washed clean, presented with a clean heart, a new and right spirit, new life?

What better hope, in the midst of our mortality, than a God who is gracious and merciful, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love?

Our hearts are already broken, but God waits to heal them, if we will place them in God’s hands, risking the vulnerability, the intimacy of private prayer, trusting our hearts to God’s hands, who will hold them, those fragile, beating things, tenderly, as the most precious gift in the world.

“For,” Jesus also says, “where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.”

God has invested great treasure in us, making us even from the dust in the divine image; breathing life into us by way of God’s own Holy Spirit; sending Jesus to us, God’s own Son. God has invested the greatest treasure in you, and where God places treasure, there the divine heart will dwell, too.

Do you doubt it? That’s ok: go into your room, close the door, and pray to God your Father your secret doubts, and your Father, who hears you in secret, who is gracious and slow to anger, who is awaiting your reconciliation, your trust, your broken heart: that God will reward you with the most tender mercy, with abounding and astonishing, heart-rending and heart-mending, steadfast love.

May you know a wholly holy, no-holds-barred Lent; and may you find new worlds, new life in the God who has entrusted the heart of Christ to you, so that you may be reconciled to him.

Amen.


[1] Martin L. Smith, The Word Is Very Near You: a guide to praying with scripture (Cowley Publications, 1989), 71

[2] Ibid, 72

Posted in holy days, homily, sermon | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Ash Wednesday treasures

“For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also,” says Jesus. God has invested great treasure in us, making us even out of the dust in the divine image; breathing life into our nostrils, even through God’s own Holy Spirit; creating in us clean hearts and new spirits; investing in a human body just to be among us, to touch us. God has invested great treasure in us, and where God’s treasure is, won’t the divine heart be/beat also?

Posted in holy days, lectionary reflection, sermon preparation | Tagged | Leave a comment

Year A Last Sunday after the Epiphany: Homeless Jesus and the Transfiguration

Some of you may have seen a news story this past week about a statue that has been installed outside an Episcopal church in Davidson, N.C.[1] The first time she saw it, one neighbourhood resident called the police, thinking that a homeless person was sleeping on a bench outside the church. (I’m actually a little concerned for this individual, who may have found accidental fame and notoriety through the reporting of this story on the internet, but I’m quoting the story because I was gripped by what it had to say about Jesus, and about the Transfiguration.)

On closer inspection, the homeless person that the woman saw turns out to be a bronzed statue of a man wrapped in a cloak or blanket, lying on a bench. There is space on the bench to sit next to him. If you do, you are close enough to see the holes that nails have left in his feet. A small plaque near the bench has the title of the work, “Homeless Jesus,” and an explanation that its inspiration derives from that passage in Matthew’s Gospel where the sheep and the goats are divided according to who fed the hungry, housed the homeless, visited the sick and the prisoners, and who did not.

The person who called the police (and perhaps she wasn’t the only one) did so no doubt for various reasons, some of them perhaps quite compassionate. It is not for us to judge her. But on further reflection, she remained uncomfortable with the statue, and is reported as saying, “Jesus is not a helpless person who needs our help… We need someone who is capable of meeting our needs, not someone who is also needy.”[2]

In other words, we, like Peter, want to stay on the summit, build booths in the bright cloud, hold on to mountaintop Jesus, rather than face the road to Jerusalem and see him helpless and hanging from the cross.

Which is, I venture, a valid point of view and fair enough. Who wouldn’t feel the same way? Unfortunately, mountain summits are rarely habitable for extended periods of time, and real life tends to happen in the valleys.

You have to wonder why we always read this story on the Sunday before entering Lent. Of course, it is the culmination of the Epiphany: the revelation of the glory of God in the face of our Lord Jesus Christ, emphatically reinforced with witness and the voice from heaven, and bright clouds. But it also comes as Jesus has turned his face towards Jerusalem, where he will be killed alongside too many of his countrymen. He has just begun to talk to his disciples of such things, and he will continue to do so more as they journey down country. It comes between stories of hunger and suffering, healing and relief; it comes in the midst of life, and it comes under the shadow of death.

Sometimes, when you’re in the valley – you know the one, the one with the shadows – then what you really need is for someone to come and sit beside you for a while, someone who has been there, who knows the score.

One of the crucial parts of the Homeless Jesus installation is the space on the bench to sit down beside him. Without such a space, even Homeless Jesus would remain out of reach, as remote as the God of the philosophers, impassive and untouchable, lost in a bright cloud.

You’ll be familiar, no doubt, with the famous quotation attributed to St Teresa of Avila:

Christ has no body but yours,
No hands, no feet on earth but yours,
Yours are the eyes with which he looks
Compassion on this world,
Yours are the feet with which he walks to do good,
Yours are the hands, with which he blesses all the world.
Yours are the hands, yours are the feet,
Yours are the eyes, you are his body.
Christ has no body now but yours,
No hands, no feet on earth but yours,
Yours are the eyes with which he looks
compassion on this world.
Christ has no body now on earth but yours.[3]

There is a counterpart to this notion, and the gospel story on which the sculpture is based makes it abundantly clear. Christ is present not only in the hands and feet and eyes of compassion that serve. He is also present in those who are hungry, who are sick, who are imprisoned, who are homeless, who are, indeed, needy. And we are called to get off our mountaintops and to serve them as if we were serving Christ himself.

When we forget that, when we forget the squalour of the manger and the shame of the cross, the dust of his feet or the borrowed tomb –foxes have holes and the birds of the air have their nests, but even in death, the Son of Man had no place to lay his head – when we forget these things, and confine Jesus to the mountaintop and the bright cloud, we not only lose sight of the needs of our neighbour, but we lose sight of God.

The Incarnation, the coming of Christ in human form, was God’s promise to us that it is not God’s intention to remain out of reach, out of touch. Irenaus, bishop of Lyon back in the second century of the Christian church, argued that, “Just as the physician is proved by his patients, so is God also revealed through men,” and, more famously, “For the glory of God is a living man.”[4]

The revelation of the Transfiguration was that here, here was the glory of God, in flesh and blood, in hands that healed and a mouth that laughed and eyes that wept and feet that walked through the wilderness and on the water and into the city, feet which would bear iron nails soon enough. A human soul and body that sat down beside its friends and matched them, need for need, and loved them through it all.

As we leave the bright cloud of the Epiphany behind us and head into the valley of Lent, in the spirit of the Incarnation and Homeless Jesus, I offer you this poem by R.S. Thomas, a twentieth-century poet-priest from Wales, called

The Coming

And God held in his hand
A small globe. Look, he said.
The son looked. Far off.
As through water, he saw
A scorched land of fierce
Colour. The light burned
There; crusted buildings
Cast their shadows; a bright
Serpent, a river
Uncoiled itself, radiant
With slime.
On a bare
Hill a bare tree saddened
The sky. Many people
Held out their thin arms
To it, as though waiting
For a vanished April
To return to its crossed
Boughs. The son watched
Them. Let me go there, he said.[5]

______________________________________________

[1] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/28/homeless-jesus-statue_n_4875892.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000051

[2] http://www.wcnc.com/news/neighborhood-news/Homeless-Jesus-sculpture-sparks-controversy-247134691.html

[3] See more at: http://blog.episcopalrelief.org/blog/episcopal-relief-and-development-stories/christs-hands-and-feet#sthash.D5FrJJpl.dpuf

[4] St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies, excerpted from Apostolic Fathers Volume I, edited by Paul A. Boer, Sr. (Veritatis Splendor Publications, 2012), Kindle edition, pp. 385, 477

[5] R.S. Thomas, “The Coming”, in R.S. Thomas, Collected Poems 1945-1990 (Phoenix, 1993), p. 234

Posted in sermon | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Transfiguration

Once upon a mountaintop I saw,
and having seen could not unsee, forget
the white light of a soft robe rendered
diamond sharp; its bright folds scratched my eyes.
For an instant only, looking up, I saw his face,
caught my breath remembering love,
the face of love shining, blurring,
doubling, tripling, dissembling in a bright cloud.
I stumbled down the mountainside, streaming,
screaming inside for what I had become
since love was lost, which now shone out;
blind to all else, I was bedazzled and bewildered.
Later, he spat on the ground, smeared mud in my eyes;
the shadows crowded back, washed away the clean light.
My sight returning as it left, a blurry mess,
I saw him leave with my heart trailing.

Posted in lectionary reflection, poetry, sermon preparation, story | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Year A Epiphany 7: How to be perfect

There is good news in the fact that the Lord our God is holy. There is grace in the perfection of our heavenly Father, and we wouldn’t want any lesser kind of god.

But what do we make of these instructions to us: Be holy, says Moses: be perfect, says Jesus?

Just, you know, do it.
Be holy.
Be perfect.
Now.

To be fair, we are not left without any guidance. This portion of Leviticus is known as the holiness code, because of the repeated use of the word, “holy.” Leviticus gives all sorts of instructions for that holiness, some of which are, to our modern, Gentile ears, quite arcane: like avoiding crossbreeding livestock or planting two crops in the same field, or wearing garments made of mixed fibres.

Yet other instructions are quite general and universally recognized as eminently sensible: you shall not steal or swindle; you shall not blaspheme; you shall not deal fraudulently with anyone; you shall not torment the vulnerable, just because you can. You shall not pervert the course of justice. You shall not deplete by your own greed the fringes of the fruitfulness of the earth that might sustain your poor neighbour. Actually, in the modern context we could be getting into controversial territory with that one, if we think about our battles over welfare and entitlements and overseas aid.

And that’s the thing. It is worth noting here that the holiness code was a set of standards for living in society. Sure, some of them were expressed at an individual level, but they were for the people as a whole, for the community of the people of God. The people had a choice, as they came into the land that they would eventually settle, to embrace the gods that they found there, or to hold fast to the Lord their God who had brought them out of Egypt, and only to God. They chose God, and the instructions of the Law were intended to be societal norms for a society which defined itself as set apart to do God’s will, as holy.

Certainly, there are areas in which we as a society fall well short of the perfection of holiness.

We agree that we shall not put an obstacle in front of someone who is deaf or blind or otherwise physically challenged – unless, as a church, we are exempt from expensive ADA requirements.

We tie ourselves in knots to resist Jesus’ command, “Do not resist an evildoer,” and replace it with the noble-sounding phrase, “stand your ground.”

We have perverted the commandments not to profit by the blood of a neighbor; not to seek vengeance. We have problems administering the death penalty in Ohio precisely because the people making the drugs that were used to kill did not want to profit by another man’s blood, did not want their product used for vengeance, and withdrew it; so we continue to hunt down alternative sources of death, and ride roughshod over the principles of others who cling more closely to the holiness code than do we, the people, with our legalized revenge.[1]

But how do we deal with “give to everyone who begs from you”?  What does, “Do not refuse anyone who wants to borrow” have to do with subprime lending? Can we reconcile, “love your enemies” with Al Qaeda?

Yes, there are areas of complexity in living a holy and perfect life. Leviticus says, “You shall not lie to one another;” yet as soon as the people begin their incursion into the Promised Land, the lies of a known prostitute, Rahab of Jericho, are precisely what open the way for them; and she is rewarded with her life, and with the acclamation of the New Testament, as one who achieved God’s purposes by faith (Hebrews11:31); as one who was shown to be righteous before God when she received the spies of Joshua as her guests and sent them safely on their way (James 2:25).

Awarding a Medal of Righteousness to a French resistor of the Nazi regime, who saved countless Jewish families by hiding them from their persecutors, creating false documents and lying to his neighbours, ‘one of the speakers said, ‘The righteous are not exempt from evil.’ [The pastor’s wife] remembers the sentence word for word. The righteous must often pay a price for their righteousness: their own ethical purity.’[2]

But such conundrums are the exceptions. We know the rules for holiness, in our hearts. We have the potential to do better, to come closer to perfection when we affirm the equality of all, the dignity of each, the value of everyone. We know the rules for holiness in our hearts. We know that perfection lies not in slavery to them, but in love. “Love your neighbour as yourself: I am the Lord,” concludes our Levitical passage. We know when we are acting out of something less than love.

The epistle advises, “do not deceive yourselves with clever excuses…. He catches the wise in their craftiness.” Paul should know. He spent his time and energy persecuting Christians in the name of holiness before he saw the light on the road to Damascus. “Do not deceive yourselves,” he says. We know when we are acting out of something less than love.

“You shall be holy, for I the Lord your God am holy,” says Moses on behalf of God. Throughout the Bible, the description of holy is used overwhelming for God above all else.

“Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect,” says Jesus.

So our consciences are guided by the holiness of God.

What would God say about privatizing the prison industry so that “success” can be defined by the number of sons and daughters we incarcerate?

What does Jesus say about the death sentence?

What does God say about providing for the poor and the alien, the undocumented, the stranger?

How would Jesus respond to an application for permission to discriminate against a brother or a sister on religious grounds?[3]

What does Jesus say, hanging from the cross: what does Jesus say about standing your ground?

We know what we are called to do: to love the Lord our God with all of our heart and all of our strength and all of our mind; to love God perfectly; and to love our neighbours as perfectly as ourselves.

We tend to hear commandments as a challenge, as trouble. But there is good news for us, too, and grace in the words of Moses and of Jesus. There is good news in the fact that the Lord our God is holy. There is grace in the perfection of our Father in heaven, and we, like our spiritual ancestors, faced with a choice wouldn’t want any lesser kind of god.

I am the Lord your God, says the Lord.

I have shown you holiness; I have shown you love. I do not resist you. When you persecute me, I set my angels to pray for you. I do not hold back from you the good things that you need. I shall not hate you, because you are my family, my children. I do not seek vengeance against you.

I am the Lord your God and I love you indiscriminately, making the sun rise on the evil and on the good, sending the rain to fall on the righteous and on the others.

I love you, whether or not you reach perfection, whether or not you are righteous, whether or not you feel holy.

I am the Lord your God.

So go ahead and be holy; be perfect; and know that God loves you perfectly, no matter what.


[2] Lest Innocent Blood Be Shed: The Story of the Village of Le Chambon and How Goodness Happened There, Philip Hallie (HarperPerennial edn, 1994), 126-7

Posted in sermon | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Seasonal affair

The seagulls are returning from
wherever it is that seagulls go when
the lake, luminous lover, has frozen them out,
but they seem chastened; they sound subdued,
touch her gingerly,
testing the waters.

Posted in poetry | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Crib Goch, and other melodramatic metaphors

On a knife edge, the threat of falling
shrouded in a misty pall,
each step a battle of will over fear.
Others stride across a broad thoroughfare;
I snarl at their sunny backs;
gravity has grappled me to the rock.

Posted in poetry | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Year A Epiphany 6: Choose life

Jesus said, “If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out.” Gruesome stuff. What does he mean by it?

I remember when our eldest child was newborn, and sleeping in my arms in the living room in front of the television, asking my husband to change the channel. Whatever movie was playing was too violent, or graphic, or somehow unsuitable for viewing with a baby in tow. My husband quite sensibly pointed out that, a) she was asleep, and that b) at a couple of weeks old she was unlikely to understand what was happening on the screen if she did happen to wake up. I don’t suppose that it was completely rational (I was a brand-new mother, and rationality was not top of my list of priorities at the time), but my gut feeling was that a) it was nevertheless bad for her to absorb such influences, even subliminally, and that b) I was at risk of passing the ill effects of such viewing on to her through my milk. I know it sounds a little crazy, but still I think that there is something to the idea that whatever we choose to take in and absorb, we will in some way pay out and feed to those around us, especially those closest to us.

Jesus said, “If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out.”

How many times have you heard someone say, “I am literally dying for a cup of coffee!” or, “These boots are murder”, or, “It’s literally freezing out there!”?

We usually recognize hyperbole when we hear it. That last one was not, in fact, great example. But when Jesus says, “Anyone who says, ‘You fool,’ commits murder,” we know that he is employing a verbal strategy to make a point and command the attention of his audience. When he says, “Cut off your right hand,” I sincerely hope that we recognize the recklessly ramped-up rhetoric. Perhaps we miss the ironic effect because Jesus didn’t add the word, “literally,” when he said that looking at another person lustfully, or getting divorced and remarried, are each and both equally identical to adultery, making him “literally” less emphatic and hyperbolic than most millennials, but these statements, too, are in the same context and category as the others. So let’s try to move beyond the shock value of the rhetorical device and try to find out just what it is that Jesus is advising in what could be his very own commentary on the Deuteronomic instruction to “choose life.”

To back up just a little bit, the Deuteronomy passage comes at the end of the giving of the law of the covenant via Moses to the people of Israel. Moses is summing up, in his final farewell to the people he has led through the wilderness under the guidance of God for forty years, and admonishing, exhorting and encouraging them to continue to follow the one who gives them life, who fed them in the famine, gave them water from the rock, and has brought them to the borders of the promised land. “Choose life,” he says. Choose God.

These are people with a poor track record for getting discouraged and distracted; they responded to the first law by creating a golden calf idol before Moses even got down from the mountain. Now, they are entering a whole new dimension of different denominations of pagan worship, and they are more than likely to get sidetracked into magic and mayhem, spiritualism and false sacrifices. Moses knows, too, that he will not be going with them into the promised land, yet the sight of the land itself is sufficient to assure him that God’s promises have been fulfilled, will be fulfilled, that there is life abundant available to his people and their descendants, forever.

Moses knows that God is the one, true God, who has stuck by them through thick and thin and without whom they would have died many times over in the desert. “Choose life,” he urges.

Jesus is addressing a different set of idols, shared among the descendants of the self-same people and subject to the same temptations to turn away from the truth to worship lies and distractions. Adultery, murder, theft, covetousness, and false witness, all concerns of the ten commandments that Moses read to the people, are presenting the same risks to the same people here and now. Lust, envy, betrayal, anger and avarice all fall under the list that Jesus offers.

He might say, “You have heard that it was said, ‘Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me,’ but I say to you that words have power. The one who hurls words as weapons might as well be considered a violent offender.” Martin Luther, in his Small Catechism, surmised that, “Murder starts in the heart. Even the thought of killing someone, or the wish that he might get hurt or harmed is a sin…Anger that is nursed develops into hatred, which is not a momentary outburst of temper, but a settled intense dislike and enmity. Hatred is the opposite of love, it is murder of the heart.” So Luther decides, “We should be kind in our words and dealings with others, patient, gentle, not easily provoked and angered, even though they be gruff and insulting.” He concludes, “Alas, how guilty are we all under this Commandment!”

Guard your tongue, Jesus is telling us, and guard your temper. It is not our place to judge; we are not to usurp the judgement of God but to be patient with our brothers and sisters, knowing that there are times when we sorely try their patience in return. Society all too often encourages us to be fearful of one another; to judge first and ask questions later. We have heard too many news stories of needless death not to know where that leads us. Jesus tells us to look through the lens of faith to see our sisters and brothers in Christ, and to seek reconciliation and relationship as a primary strategy, asking questions first in order to avoid shooting later.

He says, “Do not look on one another with lust.” From Miley Cyrus twerking to internet addiction, we are what we consume in the name of entertainment. The ancient Catholic concept of “custody of the eyes” is a response to that truism. “Custody of the eyes” says that if looking with lust will lead us astray, then we should guard our eyes in the same way that we guard our tongue and our temper, once again seeing one another through the lens of faith, as sisters and brothers in Christ, worthy of dignity and respect, as recipients of love rather than as objects of lust. Otherwise, we make idols of one another, and fools of ourselves.

My guess is that Jesus knew from his own experiences as a man the temptations that we willingly allow ourselves to entertain, to the danger of our own wellbeing and the health of our relationships.

We are bombarded every day and in every context with temptations to lust, avarice, envy. We have so many choices available to us. Advertisements and commercials assure us that we need more of this and much more of that, that we are less than we should be until we get it. They tell us over and over that we by ourselves are not strong enough, not sexy enough, not smart enough, do not have enough to win at life. True enough: we can’t do it all by ourselves. But these false promises of wholeness and satisfaction are our idols, our golden calves, our occasions of sin. Choosing them will not lead us into life.

The promise of God is that what we truly need for life has already been given freely in Jesus Christ, the promise of God revealed to us, life abundant for ourselves and those we love, forever. We do not need to fight for it, to beat anyone else down for it. We don’t need to swear by it, or to lust after it. We need only to say yes to it, to choose this life, the life of Christ, and it is ours.

And if we let it feed us, this life, this promise, then that is what we will pass on to those around us, too: love, light, and life abundant; a legacy truly worth leaving; a life worth living.

Posted in sermon | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments