Love you to death

Flashback: That week, everyone spoke in sympathetic soft, tilted voices. In a grim comedy, I parrotted their corporate condolences, squawking them directly into my father’s hearing aid.

The funeral director was trying coyly to explain the need for a high-necked outfit: the small incision to the throat which would permit the embalmer’s art. As she spoke, she shuffled papers nervously, until her eye fell on the death certificate: septicaemia. “Never mind,” she said.

“What do you mean, we can’t touch her?” asked my bewildered father. No, not us. Them. No embalming. Public health dictates that septic bodies be left intact. As she died, my mother would continue in her death, her body left to nature’s devices and decay.

The last time I saw her living, I peeled off my gloves to soothe her brow, pulled off my mask to kiss her cheek. Rolled up the gown on my way off the ward, washed my hands and hoped.

I can barely imagine doing otherwise, God forgive me. God help us.

Posted in current events, other words | Leave a comment

Render

A silhouette
against my eyelids,
black on red;
a name beaten out
by my heart’s tattoo;
the claim that staked me
through and through;
I render unto,
surrender unto –
whose image and
title is this?

Posted in lectionary reflection, poetry, prayer, sermon preparation | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Year A Proper 23: come to the feast

There have been two weddings in this church in the past ten days, and three within three months. Each was its own blend of nervousness, family friendship, family friction, love, hope, and joy. Each of them was noticeable, in the end, for its joy – never but at a wedding do you see so many people smiling from ear to ear from the first note of the prelude to the dying note of the postlude.

Not everyone remembers to smile. Over the past few months, I have heard and read more times than I can remember the sentiment of my clergy colleagues who “would rather do ten funerals than a wedding.” I wrote a blog post on it a week or so ago, frustrated by our apparent ability, facility, even talent for denying ourselves joy, for shutting ourselves out of the feast, those of us who really should know better. After all, if we do not believe that love is a good thing, that family is a God thing, that relationship is the work of the Holy Spirit, why are we in this business in the first place?

“Rejoice!” says the letter to the Philippians. “Again I say, rejoice!” Hold onto whatever is true and pleasing and excellent. Let those things fill you with joy. Rejoice.

The Bible – actually the Bible doesn’t have a great track record on preaching marital joy. From the squabbling and blame games of Adam and Eve to the curmudgeonly instructions of the bachelor Paul – marry only if you have to; better to marry than to burn, at least – with trickery and adultery and polygamy and political matches, the Bible is hardly naïve about the nature of our attempts to make of one flesh two whole, individual, independent people.

[It is also, let’s just be clear for a moment, entirely inconsistent about who should be permitted to marry whom, so that when the politicians and pundits feed us lines about biblical marriage, we should be tasting the distinct flavour of red herring.]

So the Bible doesn’t view marriage through rose-tinted glasses, but it does celebrate it. At the wedding in Cana, despite arguing with his mother, Jesus did supply enough wine to keep the party flowing. The one guest, out of the good and bad gathered from the sides of the streets, thrown out of this wedding, in this parable, was the one unprepared to celebrate, to rejoice; the one unwilling to acknowledge the joy of another, the joy all around him. He was thrown out to wail and weep with the other misery guts, so as not to bring the whole party down.

A few years ago, before I was ordained, I assisted at a funeral followed by a wedding for one family in one week. It was hard, on everyone. And yet when the day of the wedding dawned, even the widow set aside her grief and her widow’s weeds and dressed up instead in the outfit she’d planned to dance in at the wedding of her son, and everyone smiled to see the young couple make their vows, those ridiculous, marvelously, gospelly, naïve promises to love one another for a lifetime when none of us knows even what tomorrow will bring. Everyone rejoiced, even through tears, to see the celebration, to participate in the start of something new and blessed by God, something loving, something true.

The Lord God will destroy the shroud and the winding sheet; God will swallow up death forever. Instead, the Lord of hosts will make for all peoples a feast, a banquet. This is the Lord for whom we have waited, let us be glad and rejoice in his salvation,

says the prophet.

Rejoice. Again I say, rejoice. Hold onto whatever is true, and whatever is pleasing, and whatever is excellent. Let those things fill you with joy. Rejoice.

There is plenty in this world that threatens to rob us of the joy that God intends for us. We know all about disease and suffering and death and war. We know about racism and sexism and Islamophobia and homophobia. We know about selfish, petty people and we know about divisive politics. We know violence and we know hunger and we know all too much about all too many things that threaten to rob us of the joy that God intends for us.  We do not need to rob ourselves of joy that is offered to us on a plate full of wedding cake. We do not need to deny the joy of others. That is too easy. Rejoice, says the epistle. Again I say, rejoice.

A friend reminded me this week of the difference between happiness and joy. Happiness, she said, comes from happenstance; stuff that happens. It is irregular, it is conditional, it is unpredictable.

Joy does not depend upon circumstances so much as on decisions. We can choose to be joyful even in the face of fearful things. (That is not to say that we always can choose joy, on command, on demand. We are prone to suffering, and when it takes us by surprise, or it wears us down with its persistence, it can take an effort and it can take time to return to joy.)

But joy depends less on happenstance than on the knowledge that whatever happens, God is with us. Joy is a choice. The choice to rejoice. To hold on to whatever is true, honourable, pure, just, pleasing, commendable, excellent; those things that speak to us of God, and communicate the joy with which God made us and invites us and blesses us. The joy which God promises us, after death has been destroyed, even in the midst of life.

And here is the promise of that joy, that feast, to which all are invited, the good and the bad found along the roadside, you and I, and the only wedding garment with which we are ordered to adorn ourselves our grateful hearts, and the joy that comes from within.

In the older versions of our prayerbook, there was an exhortation for the priest to use when giving notice of Communion and inviting the parish to its celebration:

Dearly beloved brethren, on — I intend, by God’s grace, to celebrate the Lord’s Supper: unto which, in God’s behalf, I bid you all who are here present; and beseech you, for the Lord Jesus Christ’s sake, that ye will not refuse to come thereto, being so lovingly called and bidden by God himself. Ye know how grievous and unkind a thing it is, when a man hath prepared a rich feast, decked his table with all kind of provision, so that there lacketh nothing but the guests to sit down; and yet they who are called (without any cause) most unthankfully refuse to come. Which of you in such a case would not be moved? Who would not think a great injury and wrong done unto him? Wherefore, most dearly beloved in Christ, take ye good heed, lest ye, withdrawing  yourselves from this holy Supper, provoke God’s indignation against you.

It is an easy matter for a man to say I will not communicate  because I am otherwise hindered with worldly business. But such  excuses are not so easily accepted and allowed before God. If any man say, I am a grievous sinner and therefore am afraid to come; wherefore then do ye not repent and amend? When God calleth you are ye not ashamed to say ye will not come? When ye should return to God, will ye excuse yourselves, and say ye are not ready? Consider earnestly with yourselves how little such feigned excuses will avail before God.

Those who refused the feast in the Gospel, because they had bought a farm, or would try their yokes of oxen, or because they were  married, were not so excused, but counted unworthy of the heavenly feast. Wherefore according to mine Office, I bid you in the Name of God, I call you in Christ’s behalf, I exhort you, as ye love your own salvation that ye will be partakers of this Holy Communion.

Rejoice always; again I say, rejoice. Come then, let us keep the feast.

Posted in sermon | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

an-oblation

full or smashed empty,

spilt or splinted, say that I

am; or you are not

Posted in haiku, poetry, prayer | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The wedding robe

White lace cut down to a christening robe.
Later, a doll with curly blonde hair wore
my mother’s leftover wedding weeds,
a moulded Miss Haversham
preserved in plastic, dressed for the feast,
rosebud lips perpetually parted for love.

Posted in lectionary reflection, poetry, sermon preparation | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Year A Proper 22: parables and other stories

There is a kind of through the looking glass feel to this parable. If you think of the classic fairy tale structure, where a king sends three messengers on a quest to redeem his belongings, in this case the wine of his vineyard, the story goes something like this:

A king had three sons. He also had a vineyard which he carefully prepared and left in the hands of tenants. When the time came for the vineyard to yield up its harvest, the king sent his eldest son to negotiate with the tenants, but they tricked the eldest son, and he fell for their trickery out of greed or dishonesty or plain dumb stupidity, and his fall led to his death. After a while, as he had not returned, the king sent his second son out after him. Again, the tenants ran rings around the middle child, and he, too, fell prey to their wickedness and his own insufficiency. Finally, the third son, the youngest, the darling one, came to his father and begged to be allowed to try his hand at completing the quest. The king at first refused, afraid to lose his one remaining heir, but eventually he relented, and the youngest son set out, and through a combination of charm, bright honesty, righteous cunning and winning ways, defeated the tenants, and restored the king’s rightful property. The watchtower turned out to contain an imprisoned princess. The king was so glad to receive his vineyard back, and the princess’s father so glad to receive his daughter back, that between them they endowed the happy couple with marriage, riches, and happy ever after.

That’s how the story is supposed to go. And in that classic context we don’t worry so much about the fate of the wicked tenants, nor allow them to fill us with the fear of hellfire.

But this parable has skewed the picture, and here’s why. There is no happy ending. There is no ending. The king leases his vineyard to new tenants, and the suspicion may be that the same cycle will at some point repeat itself. After all, Jesus is quoting and developing a parable used by Isaiah eight centuries or so earlier, ending with judgement, which was picked up by the Psalmist, pleading for restoration, which has cycled through scripture and repeated whenever it appeared appropriate to the times. It is not a fairy tale, nor is it a fable with a single moral to the story. It is a complex narrative with multiple points of entry, capable of conveying meaning to chief priests in first-century Judea, prophets in the eighth century before them, people of the un-thought-of nation of America two thousand years hence.

There is no happy ending, because there is no ending; but there is hope in this parable. The central character of the story is not the tenants who come to a bad end, nor the slaves and the son whom they sacrifice. It is the vineyard. And in the ending that we have, the king reclaims his land. He starts over. He makes sure that the vineyard is sustainable. He does not give up and he does not let go. He does what is necessary to ensure that his vines grow. Back in the Song of Songs, God says, “My vineyard, my very own, is for myself;” it is a love song.

There is judgement in the parable. It is present in Isaiah, and in Matthew. Back in Hosea, the vine itself is unfaithful; as it grows and spreads, it offers its fruits back to other kings, other gods. There is judgement in the image. But there are many different ways to find ourselves in the parable.

The vines may be each of us, any of us whom God has planted in this good earth to bear fruit. The parable asks, are we rendering our harvest back to God? Sometimes vines need pruning; are we taking care of our roots, our fruitful brances, are we shedding deadwood as we grow, that which makes us less healthy, less productive, less alive? The hope for the vines is that God has planted us, and tends us, and cares for us.

And what of the tenants? Which of us does not bear some responsibility to care for the vineyard of God? If we are parents, or godparents, we have promised at the baptism of our children, our charges, to raise them in the knowledge and love of God, and of God’s Son, Jesus Christ our Lord. If we are baptized ourselves, we have promised to work in the vineyard of the world, proclaiming the gospel in word and deed, seeking and serving Christ in all persons. How diligently are we tending to the vines that are in our care? What fruits are we offering back to God? And how do we respond to those messengers from God who come to our conscience and demand an accounting, those little taps on the doors of our souls? Do we offer ourselves back to God, or do we kill them and bury them, hoping God won’t notice?

Or are we called to be the slaves, the prophets, the ones sent to be those clarion calls to the conscience of others? Do we have the courage?

But as I said, the central character of this parable, this set of parables is the vineyard. As Jesus told it, the vineyard is the people of Israel, planted and protected by God, but betrayed by God’s stewards, the chief priests and elders. The vineyard is those who find themselves betrayed and occupied by unsympathetic forces: the Judeans under Rome; the Christians of Iraq, under threat of extinction from ISIS; the democrats of Hong Kong; those living under the oppression of poverty and systemic inequality, awaiting benefits that never bear fruit; those living in fear of debilitating disease, of Ebola, of death; all of those who feel as though God, their king, has left to go and live in a far away country, out of sight and out of reach.

The hope of this parable for those people is that God has not forgotten them, that God has not forsaken them, that God will return and roust out those who would do evil unto them and restore them.

This is not a fairy story with a happy ending and a moral in its tail. This is a description of the real cycle of faith and life that we live out in the presence of God. Its message is an appeal to our conscience, yes; but it is also a promise that God will not, does not abandon that which God has planted. Its lack of an ending is a reminder, true and to be trusted, that God’s mercy endures forever.

Amen.

Posted in sermon | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Four weddings and a funeral

Over the past few months, I have heard and read more times than I can remember the sentiment of my clergy colleagues who “would rather do ten funerals than a wedding.”* With two in a row the next two Saturdays, the phrase has been haunting me, and I have decided, emphatically, to disagree.

A few years ago, before I was ordained, I assisted at a funeral followed by a wedding for one family in one week. It was hard, on everyone. The wedding I am taking tomorrow could too easily have gone the same way, and I am more delighted than I can say to be welcoming this family to this wedding, and not to that funeral.

Of course, it’s not that I don’t get my friends’ frustrations, nor do I for a moment believe that they would rather see their people mourn than dance. Still, I am sorry that we seem to be all too willing to rob ourselves of joy when it is handed to us on a piece of wedding cake.

So this afternoon, on my Friday day off, when I head into work to run this wedding rehearsal, I will be ready to smile at foibles, shake my head knowingly at freak-outs, and laugh at the ridiculous and marvellous, gospelly naivety of people who promise one another a lifetime of love and fidelity when none of us knows even what tomorrow will bring. Then, tomorrow, I will place them in the hands of God to bless them (see what I did there?), and return home to my own spouse to wonder what on earth we thought we were doing half a lifetime ago when we made the same promises, with the same ridiculous hope and joy.

And maybe we will dance.

* If you have said this in my presence recently, please don’t be offended. This is not about you, personally – honestly, I have heard it so many times I’m not sure I know anyone who hasn’t said it. And I love you, and wish you stupid, naive, ridiculous joy.

Posted in other words | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Vineyards

I cannot grow an apple tree,
aromatic herbs, fresh flowers.
I dig and plant and water and weed;
everything dies.
I drink the wine of another’s vineyard,
climb the walls to scrump the orchard,
cadge the scent of another’s roses
passing by.
In the spring, unprompted, a bud.
I try not to tread it down.
The God has reclaimed the garden
as her own.

Posted in lectionary reflection, poetry, sermon preparation | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Year A Proper 21: a problem with authority

Based on today’s New Testament texts: Philippians 2:1-13; Matthew 21:23-32

Let the same mind be in you that is in Christ Jesus.

Here’s a little window into the mind of Jesus; the humble one, the slave, obedient unto death, even death on a cross.

“By whose authority do you do these things?” they asked him, as Jesus strode into the temple, turning tables, teaching, preaching, proclaiming good news and acting it by way of his healing touch. The chief priests and the elders would like to see a little less authority out of Jesus, and a little more of that legendary humility.

The chief priests and the elders have a problem with authority, and it is not related to humility. There is more than one way to abuse authority. We know that the chief priests and the elders, by the end of the week in which this exchange takes place (because yes, we are back here, in Holy Week, after the triumphant procession of Palm Sunday, after the turning of the tables, after the healing miracles, God forbid!)

We know how the chief priests and the elders will overstep their authority by colluding with the forces of oppression to murder the God Incarnate. Men of God committing deicide out of sheer cowardice.

But there is more than one way to abuse one’s authority.

Jesus fixed them with his question: if you want to know about my authority, tell me about yours? What did you do about John?

We know that they heard him – he called them a brood of vipers, and they allowed it. If they had said that they didn’t believe him, they should have denounced him to the crowd, they should have warned them about false prophets.

They, the leaders and teachers of the people, should have done their duty and led, with authority; led the people away from the River and back to the Temple, rejecting the baptism of John. It was their responsibility to lead the people with authority. But instead they stood, and watched, and said nothing.

If they did believe him, they did worse. You remember what happened to John, in the end, imprisoned by Herod, executed, in the end, on a drunken whim. If the chief priests and the elders did believe John, they should have denounced his execution, defended him; they should have used their authority to rally the crowds behind him and rescue him.

They did neither. They abdicated their authority, the authority entrusted to them as religious leaders, as men appointed by God and their community to speak truth to power and to the populace; to pray and to act with authority and with the authenticity of their call and with courage.

Jesus fixed them with his question, and they did not know how to answer him. My guess is they didn’t even know where to look.

“I don’t need to explain my authority to you,” concluded Jesus. “You have enough problems with authority of your own.”

“Let the same mind be in you that is in Christ Jesus. Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit. Let each of you look not to your own interests, but to the interests of others.”
Jesus’ humility, his love for others, his interest in the interests of others has nothing to do with abdicating his authority or his call to act and speak courageously. On the contrary, putting the interests of others before his own is exactly what got him into trouble.

It’s complicated. In another way, it’s very simple.

We are the chief priests and the elders of our day. Not just those of us with the robes and the ordination certificate – although I will admit to a certain responsibility for the authority I have been granted. But we call ourselves a priesthood of believers, ordained each of us by our baptism to proclaim the gospel in word and deed, to seek and serve Christ in all people, to uphold justice and the dignity of everyone we meet and those we will never encounter – all of us, each of us is ordained by our baptism as a priest to the people around us.

The authority that Jesus has given us as disciples is also our call to put the interests of others ahead of our own – not as an act of abdication but as an act of genuine, authentic service, loving our neighbours as ourselves, each of them and all of them, as a direct result and corollary of our love for God and the love that God has shared with us in Christ Jesus.

It is not a life without conflict, or struggle. When he sent out his disciples to preach the kingdom of God Jesus told them there would be difficulties, even danger. Because there is the authority that the world grants us, and the authority given by God.

The authority that the world grants each of us is arbitrary and unequal. I get a lot of leeway by virtue of my ordination, my education, my age, by being White, and having just the right kind of foreign accent. Others get more around here, perhaps for being male, or American-born; others less, perhaps for having just the wrong kind of foreign accent, or simply for being not White.

When the world treats us unequally, inequitably, when we deny the authority of another to be the author of his or her own life (or at least co-authors, with God), the freedom to write his or her own story in the pages of the book of life that God has given them, then the world reveals its own problems with authority. And we know it. We chief priests and elders know when we hear the truth: that there is a problem in this country, with racial profiling, with violence, with selfish conceit and ambition and a distinct failure of society as a whole to put the needs and interests of anyone ahead of its own. We see it in Ferguson and in Florida and in Beavercreek, Ohio. We have a problem.

So Jesus asks us, how will we exercise our authority, as priests to the people, as elders in our church, commissioned and ordained by our baptism to uphold the dignity, the authenticity, of every human being? Not only here, with our words and worship together, but out in the vineyard, how will we speak for justice? Will we have the courage to seek and serve Christ in all persons, or will we hand him over to the authorities to be crucified?

Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus, who did not see his equality with God as something to be grasped at, but emptied himself in order to stand shoulder to shoulder with us; who humbled himself in obedience to the law of love, loving even to death. His humility was not timid, nor did it compromise his authority to proclaim the Gospel in word and deed. No; it was by putting the interests of others before his own; it was by loving God and his neighbours with the strength of God and the authority to speak truth to power; it was by his fierce faithfulness to the kingdom of God, even to his death and beyond, that this humble man brought the whole world to its knees.

Let the same mind be in you as was in Christ Jesus. Amen.

Posted in sermon | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Year A Proper 21: By whose authority?

Rarely does Jesus give a straight answer to a straight question; but rarely, too, is he quite as direct about his indirection as he is here. Leading to the following reflection:

Can you imagine being Jesus’ mother?
I don’t mean that part –
we’ve all seen the paintings and the sculptures
and the visions of that part. But
can you imagine being Jesus’ mother
on all of the other days?

“What would you like for breakfast, dear?”
“What do we have?”
“Fresh-baked bread and a few warm eggs.”
“Bring them here.”
“Bring them here, what?”
“Bring them here so that I may be
about my father’s work.”
“The word I was looking for,
Jesus,
was please.”

That was back in the days when
he would give a straight answer.

“Where are you going?”
“The Spirit blows where it will.”
“What time will you be home?”
“No one knows the day, or the hour.”

By the time he was teenaged, he had
perfected the art of answering
a question with a question,
[“Where have you been?”
“Where do you think?”]
in such a way that sometimes he was
out of the house and out of town
before his mother knew what had happened.

No wonder, when he began to get famous,
and they asked her what it was like,
raising a Messiah,
she put her head on its side
and fixed them straight:
“What do you think?”

Posted in lectionary reflection, sermon preparation | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment