The justice of God is love

A sermon for 24 September 2023 at the Church of the Epiphany, Euclid, Ohio. The parable of the day labourers is told in the context of manna in the wilderness and Paul’s letter to the Philippians. Content warning: This sermon addresses thoughts of suicide.


The justice of God is generous. 

This parable, in which God, as represented by the owner of the vineyard, overturns all expectations of what is just and right and due to the people in the field. It confounds those who demand righteous judgement, reward and punishment according to our scheme of justice. Instead of giving them each according to his works, God gives them all exactly what they need: their daily bread, simply because God can.

It is the will of God, then, to care for God’s people, to love them, sustain them, be generous to them. And when the first ones grumble, God asks them, did I not give you, too, what you need, as we agreed? Why then do you begrudge the gift to these others, instead of rejoicing with them that they, too, can eat tonight? Why, indeed, when otherwise they would be dependent upon your charity instead of my largesse?

I can’t help hearing the grumblings and mutterings of those who complain about immigrants receiving healthcare, or their children an education, or grouse about those who cannot work getting benefits, each their daily bread. Why would we not provide for those to whom God would undoubtedly be generous, if this parable were to be believed?

And the owner of the vineyard, notice, does more than sit back and wait for the needful to come to him. No, he goes out into the marketplace not once, not twice, but hour after hour, looking for those in need of his help, seeking people to whom to be generous. God does not wait to be merciful, but God goes out, God comes to us, offering God’s hand; “Come with me, let us go together to the vineyard, so that I may show you grace.”

And who are we, honestly, to complain of it.

It is human to complain of it. But if we try to partner instead with God, to see as far as we can from a Christ’s-eye view, can we see ourselves invited into the celebration of generosity, to rejoice with those who had no expectation of mercy, of grace, instead of complaining that we deserve more?

It’s a process. It takes practice. It takes prayer.

There is another point of view to take into account, of course, when reading this parable. What about the ones who were left in the marketplace all day, increasingly anxious about how they would earn their daily bread, whether they would be chosen, what they were worth to anyone who came by.

We know, as those who have read the parable through, that a satisfying ending is coming; more than satisfying: a generous ending. But for those waiting in the shadows of the story not yet told, as the shadows shorten and lengthen across the town square, there is a sense of despondency, of dread, of depression that hangs heavier with each hour. How does the vineyard owner find them? Do they stand eager and hopeful every time a cart rattles by, or are they slumped into corners of the courtyard, kicking up dust with their sandals?

I’m going to mention something very sensitive now, because given what we have heard from St Paul about living and dying, and hearing it in September, which is national suicide prevention month, and imagining the ebbing hope of the labourers left behind in the marketplace, I think we need to talk about it.

There are those of us here who can relate to Paul’s expressed struggle over which he prefers: to live this life or to hasten into the next. He concludes that he will stay here, and I have to say how glad I am that we are all still here. But if the waiting, the hoping, the living become heavy enough that you feel the scales tipping, I want you to do three things. I want you to have the suicide crisis line, dial 988, on speed dial in your phone. And I want you, if you have guns in your home, to find someone you trust to take them out of your reach. 

And I want you to remember this: the vineyard owner did not give up on the day. He did not give up on those waiting for relief, for someone to choose them. He did not see them idle and consider them worthless; he sought them out and paid them their dues as people deserving of daily bread, of dignity, of generosity, of the love of God.

However the shadows lengthen, the vineyard owner is still on his way. He has not given up on the day. He has not given up on us.

The justice of God, then, is this: that whether we consider ourselves deserving of pleasure or punishment, bonus or the bare minimum, God gives us each our daily bread. The justice of God is this: that whether anyone else sees it, God looks at us as though looking in a mirror. We are made in the image of God, and in that image, God sees infinite value. The justice of God is this: that at the end of the day, God’s mercy is waiting to surprise us with God’s righteous and marvellous, unearned and undeservable generosity.

The justice of God is that God loves us, first and last. No exceptions.

Amen.


Exodus 16:2-15, Psalm 105:1-6, 37-45 , Philippians 1:21-30, Matthew 20:1-16

Posted in lectionary reflection, sermon | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The middle man

The manager suspected
that his boss might be a good man,
God help us, he muttered,
manipulating money into
open palms and curling fingers alike.
Sunset played the devil with his eyes,
garbling the complaints of weary
and incandescent workers,
while those who left first,
looking back, saw him haloed
as though with living fire.

Posted in lectionary reflection, poetry, prayer, sermon preparation | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Quality and quantity

A sermon for Year A Proper 19, particularly Matthew 18:21-35

__________________________________

It’s not often that Jesus answers a question with a straightforward and immediate answer. I’m not entirely certain that’s what Jesus is doing here, either: Peter asks how often he should forgive a fellow church member for sinning against him: as many as seven times? And Jesus answers right away, depending upon your translation, “Not seven, but seventy-seven (or seventy times seven) times!”

The difficulty is immediately apparent. We don’t even know what number Jesus quoted: how are we to know how many times we have to count to ten before we get to the number after the one Jesus set as the outer limit for forgiveness?

And that’s the point, isn’t it. It’s the point of the parable that Jesus tells before circling back to Peter with some pointed words about forgiving from the heart. From the heart. As from the heart of God that knows no outer limits of forgiveness.

The amount owed by the slave in the parable was astronomical. There was no way that king was ever getting all of his money back! How the slave had accumulated such a debt is not addressed: was the interest punitive? Was it the product of embezzlement? There is something not right about this debt from the start; yet the king, who has the power to do so, decides to forgive not only the debt, but the servant himself. He doesn’t even ask for a payment plan!

Then the forgiven one goes out and, despite the mercy shown to him, fails to extend that mercy to others. Having failed to extend it, he falls victim to his own failure, and ends up in prison after all. Not through his original debt but through his refusal to offer mercy to others does he fall.

So, Jesus concludes to Peter, that’s what happens when you don’t forgive from your heart. You are imprisoned, hoist by your own petard, bound by your own fetters, your own meanness and unmercy.

If you are counting how many times you have had to forgive this brother of yours, then in your heart of hearts, you have not really forgiven him. The wound is still festering.

This whole discourse about forgiveness, offence, discipline, the community of mercy that we have been following for the past few weeks is exposed, laid bare, solved by Jesus’ unmathematical formula. Seven, the perfect number of creation, used biblically to represent what is holy, is itself multiplied until we no longer know even what the number is supposed to be. Seven, the number that crowns creation with sabbath, with rest, is multiplied toward the peace of God that passes understanding.

It is not the quantity of forgiveness that is in question, then, but the quality.

We’ve talked before about the need to be careful of language that makes forgiveness a foil or cover for abuse. Forgiveness is not trying to make ourselves feel better about what has been done wrong. It is about trying to bring justice, not vengeance or punishment, but healing to a wrongness, to make it as right as we are able.

Sometimes, that has to happen from afar. Our forgiveness cannot depend upon the repentance of the other, since that would rob us of our ability to be merciful without the other’s permission. That doesn’t sound very Christlike.

But sometimes, sometimes we are implicated in helping make the situation whole, so that the sin doesn’t keep on happening seven times, or seven times seven. Sometimes, if we are to forgive from our heart, unlike the slave in the parable, we need to change, perhaps allow ourselves to be changed.

Can I talk about something hard for a moment (none of this is easy!)?

On Wednesday, I wrote the following in response to some nasty news out of Euclid:

The headline [read]: 10-year-old girl shot in arm in Euclid, suspect arrested.

It was the middle of the afternoon, and her school had just let out. She was about home. Thank God, she is reported as recovering from her injury; how long it will take her, her family, her friends, her community to stop shaking was not speculated upon in the article.

The report went on to say that she was hit by a stray bullet. … Think about it: stray bullets with no home nor owner, wandering our streets, looking for somewhere to lodge. …

Calling a bullet stray, like a wandering and mangy dog, is akin to brushing off offence without regard to healing the conditions that gave rise to it or the harm its kind can continue to cause as long as we refuse to call it what it is. Justice is not just a matter of calling the bullet-owner to account. It is coming to terms with our loose culture of bullet-ownership.

The way of the Cross calls us to look death (its dominions and its minions) in the eye and call it what it is, not in fear but in faith that Christ has already trodden this path for us. There are no stray bullets, just as there were no stray nails pounding themselves into the Cross.

What good is forgiveness that doesn’t make a difference? That keeps the offences coming? No, it’s not about the quantity of forgiveness, but about its quality.

Later this morning, a small group of us will gather to continue our work toward Becoming Beloved Community through our Sacred Ground curriculum. We learn about our history and the ways in which it has divided and categorize us and continues its aftershocks of racism throughout our communities. We learn not only for information, but in hope that we can change the patterns, little by little, with God’s help, one breath at a time.

On Wednesday, I wrote:

Last evening, at Bible Study, we discussed our responsibility not only to forgive, but to change situations, structures, and relationships that give rise to trespass, so that the sin does not keep repeating; to create conditions where true repentance and healing are possible. We talked about the need not to paper over patterns of harm, but to confront them with truthful, hopeful, discerning hearts, in order to bring mercy not only to sinners but to the sinned against.

True forgiveness does not enable continuing harm. That was not Jesus’ purpose on the Cross. Rather, his forgiveness is something that changes hearts, changes lives, turns our souls toward God. Remember the Centurion who witnessed it all, who could not help but cry out, “Surely this man was innocent, righteous, the Son of God!” (Matthew 27:54, Mark 15:39, Luke 23:47).

How many times must we practice such forgiveness from the heart before we begin to make a difference in our world? It starts with a single breath, a heartbeat, and multiplies to fill God’s creation with the love that we have received, and that we are called to share with all whom we meet, seventy time seven, or as far as Christ’s love can reach.

Amen

Posted in lectionary reflection, sermon | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Seventy times seven

How many hurts accumulate
like straws under a camel’s nose
before it sneezes,
before the involuntary blast
of anger, grief, ugliness propels
one’s inside out, clutches
at the throat like stone eggs,
tears a slow, impassible river
floating faded, sodden grass
toward the sea? Seven and seventy
you say? And tell a parable
of how the only way to lessen
that weight that scores
the camel’s back is to lose count.


For a different approach to this Sunday’s Gospel, see yesterday’s post: No stray bullets

Posted in lectionary reflection, poetry, prayer, sermon preparation | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

No stray bullets

Peter came and said to him, “Lord, if another member of the church sins against me, how often should I forgive? As many as seven times? Jesus said to him, “Not seven times, but, I tell you, seventy-seven times. For this reason the kingdom of heaven may be compared …” (Mt. 18:21-23)


The headline this morning: 10-year-old girl shot in arm in Euclid, suspect arrested.

It was the middle of the afternoon, and her school had just let out. She was about home. Thank God, she is reported as recovering from her injury; how long it will take her, her family, her friends, her community to stop shaking was not speculated upon in the article.

The report went on to say that she was hit by a stray bullet. I was struck by the all-too-familiar phrase, one that has resonance far beyond this sad case. Think about it: stray bullets with no home nor owner, wandering our streets, looking for somewhere to lodge.

Last evening, at Bible Study, we discussed our responsibility not only to forgive, but to change situations, structures, and relationships that give rise to trespass, so that the sin does not keep repeating; to create conditions where true repentance and healing are possible. We talked about the need not to paper over patterns of harm, but to confront them with truthful, hopeful, discerning hearts, in order to bring mercy not only to sinners but to the sinned against.

Calling a bullet stray, like a wandering and mangy dog, is akin to brushing off offence without regard to healing the conditions that gave rise to it or the harm its kind can continue to cause as long as we refuse to call it what it is. Justice is not just a matter of calling the bullet-owner to account. It is coming to terms with our loose culture of bullet-ownership.

The way of the Cross calls us to look death (its dominions and its minions) in the eye and call it what it is, not in fear but in faith that Christ has already trodden this path for us. There are no stray bullets, just as there were no stray nails pounding themselves into the Cross.

It is up to us to choose another way, another Word, to choose life. Our children – every child – deserves better than “a stray bullet.”

Posted in current events, gun violence, lectionary reflection, sermon preparation | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Our hope is in Jesus

A sermon at the Church of the Epiphany, Euclid, 10 September 2023. Matthew 18:15-20


For where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them.

Jesus is here. Jesus is with us. I’d better watch what I say!

So let’s start with, I messed up last week. I mean, I mess up all of the time, but last week, in a particular and specific way, I erred and I hurt someone, without meaning to, but with effect. I didn’t know until they told me, and I was able to apologize, and repent, and ask forgiveness. And because this community is steeped in the Gospel of God’s great mercy to us, I believe that I have been forgiven.

In the broader church context, we have heard over the past week how we do not always behave, as an institution, or as individuals within it, in the ways that would bring glory to God and do justice to that mercy, or love to one another. You may have read the letter from the President of our House of Deputies decrying the outcome of a complaint that was taken to the church, with more than one witness, and that has not resulted yet in healing or reconciliation.

There are so many layers to this: layers of sexism, racism, hierarchical power dynamics, clericalism, and abuse.

We are doing some soul-searching about it all, as an institution. Our House of Bishops is particularly implicated in this business, and our Bishop Anne has written to us with her commitment and hope to be part of the healing that is needed. But as House of Deputies President Julia Ayala Harris wrote in her letter, “Transforming the culture within our church is a collaborative effort that requires participation from everyone. Together, we have work to do to ensure the safety of all people within our community and to strengthen the integrity of our disciplinary processes.”

It is no doubt notable that we read this gospel on UBE (Union of Black Episcopalians) Sunday. As such, we have paired it with a reading and psalm appointed for the commemoration of Alexander Crummell. You can read more of his experience here, but even a quick glance at the beginnings of his ministry, the ways in which the system repeatedly attempted to exclude him simply because of his colour, makes a poignant juxtaposition to Matthew’s appeal to the church itself to resolve disputes. What if it is the church that is in the wrong? What if the problem is not individual offences but the deep and abiding offence of racism that is dug into the foundations of the church in America (and too many other places)? Then to whom should we go?

We are a house full of sinners. We are hurt and hurting, hurt-full people.

So when Matthew describes how the church is to be, in matters of discipline, order, and offence, it is no surprise that he anticipates that it will not always be easy to repair the breach. But it is telling, I think, that he ends with this promise from Jesus, that where two or three are gathered in his name, he is with us.

He is with us. He is God with us, Emmanuel.

And here is our hope: not in disciplinary measures and Title IV task forces – as important as they truly are to our life together and our integrity, they are not where we invest our hope. Our hope is in the healing power and merciful grace of Jesus Christ, who lived and died and lives still for us sinners.

Trusting in Christ, we need not be afraid to confess our sins, our neediness, our brokenness. When Matthew writes to the church that if one will not listen to discipline, “let such a one be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector,” do we remember how Jesus treated tax collectors and outsiders, outcasts and even his betrayer? There is such irony there, isn’t there?

And there is hope. If we, as followers of Jesus, if we can trust in his healing power and merciful grace and understanding, then can we trust one another enough to confess when we are wrong and forgive when we have been wronged? Are we able to build a community that protects the innocent and brings to repentance those who are ready to be reconciled? 

This is not a call to paper over errors and worse with whitewashed words of false or cheap forgiveness. That does not move the needle on justice. Matthew describes a process that involves difficult truth-telling, the need often for allies, and the risk of a breach. But, he hears Jesus promising, when you do this work, I am with you. Where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them.

I appeal to you, if I have sinned against you, let me know, and I will do my best to humble myself to admit my error and amend my ways. If the church sins against you, we do have processes in place to help with the work of truth-telling, repentance, and healing, and we’re still working on them. You can start with me, or with our Wardens, or with our Bishop’s Office, as you feel best served. I messed up, and because someone told me about it, I was able to repent, and to be forgiven.

If we lean on the love of Jesus, even when we fail, even when we cannot accomplish that healing ourselves, we know how Jesus will pursue even those we call Gentiles and tax collectors, how he will angle for them with his love, even when we are no longer able; how he will love us indefatigably into repentance.

And if we are in the wrong, when we are in the wrong, when I am in the wrong, Jesus still shows up for us, comes to our table, despite our betrayals, and feeds us with his righteous, indiscriminate, abundant mercy.

Thanks be to God.


Alexander Crummell: Ecclesiasticus 39:6-11, Psalm 19:7-11; Year A Proper 18: Romans 13:8-14, Matthew 18:15-20

Posted in lectionary reflection, sermon | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Two or three

Two or three: Jesus

why are you afraid to be

too alone with me?

______________

#preparingforSundaywithpoetry. This Sunday’s Gospel is full of numbers – no, not of numbers, of people, unalone.

Matthew 18:15-20

Posted in lectionary reflection, poetry, prayer, sermon preparation, story | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Who I am

Last week, when Jesus asked his disciples who people said he was, who they said he was, when Simon Peter confessed him as the Christ, the Son of the living God, and Jesus told Simon Peter who he was, the rock. And here, the rock has so soon become a stumbling block, because he wants to deny that the Son of the living God can suffer and die – understandable! But we do not follow a saviour, lean on a saviour who is indifferent to or ignorant of the trials of this world, but rather one who has gone through them so that he can bring us through into new life. 

Who we say God is determines who we say we are, who are made in God’s image, who are neighbour is, also made in God’s image. Who we say we are, in turn, has a whole lot of influence over what we do, how we are in the world.

It’s strange that Jesus tells Peter that his mind is stuck on human things rather than the divine. In some ways, it seems as though the opposite applies: Peter is looking for a miracle, a theophany, a deus ex machina to usher in the Messianic age; he doesn’t want Jesus to take the very human road of suffering in body and in spirit that is the symptom of our mortality. Peter wants to skip straight to heaven.

Perhaps the problem is our definition of what is human and what is divine. What if our hope is not only in the heavens – although that is true hope, too. But what it this life, created and sustained and shared by the Son of the living God – is our share in the work of the Divine? What if we were to take seriously the doctrine of creation – not as a substitute for scientific knowledge, mind you, but as a window open to it? What if we remember that God created us to be in relationship with God, to reflect God’s image in our relationship with the rest of creation? What if we owned not only our authority but our responsibility to God, to one another, to creation?

Then we would be with it in the hurting and the harm of climate change. We wouldn’t deny it, or just hope for the best. Those temptations, to find ourselves above it all, or to throw ourselves from the pinnacle of the temple, devil-may-care, and trust that the angels will catch us – Jesus dealt with those, too. And he said, Away with you, Satan. Get behind me. 

We will suffer with the planet, grieve with the earth and the oceans. And that is where God is, how Jesus is with us. Not here to escape our humanity but to heal it, to perfect it, and in his commitment to the way of the Cross, we see that humanity is perfected in love, in humility, in the mercy modelled by the Son of the living God. We see that these traits are the image of the divine: that compassion – not turning away, not denying, but bearing with – that the compassion that gave birth to the Incarnation is at the heart of the Divine. 

Who we say God is matters. Moses, faced with a burning bush which is yet unconsumed – because our God is a Creator, not a destroyer – Moses asks God for a name, for a divine identity to share with his people. And God answers in the purest, most generous form: I am

When God says, I am, God says, I am with you. When God says, I am the God of your ancestors, God says, I have always been with you. When Jesus said, I will go to the Cross for you, God with us, Emmanuel, is saying, I am always with you. Through it all, in it all, so that I can bring you through the storm to safe harbour, still waters.

I am who I am – I am God! I am the God who has always been and I am the God who will be with you. Be still, then, child, and know that I am.


Year A Proper 17: Exodus 3:1-15, Matthew 16:21-28

Posted in lectionary reflection, sermon | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Savour

This week’s #preparingforSundaywithpoetry perhaps bears more relation to the stories of Jesus’ original temptation than to his twin command to Peter to, “Get behind me, Satan!” But between those threads, and the idea that one could follow Jesus, taking up the cross but not tasting death? – that is where this poem caught me today. I hope it’s still useful to your prayer and preparation for Sunday’s strange interpretation of what is good news.


Savour

Some will not taste death; others 
lick it like salt from their skin, 
the ones with eyes like atlases. 
Flashback to the desert, sand 
gritted between teeth and palate, 
tongue coated with a sapour that 
no vinegar will slake, spitting 
drily at the devil, “Go to hell!” 
rising like acid with the effort. 
Shadows fall crosswise, shifting 
and lengthening with the tide 
of the sun. In their wings, 
angels and wild beasts hover,  
patient for the suffering of the saviour. 


Year A Proper 17: Matthew 16: 21-28

Posted in lectionary reflection, poetry, prayer, sermon, sermon preparation | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Don’t we?

It has been a horrible weekend for gun violence in America. I cannot keep my heart from going out to the family of the teenager gunned down at a high school football game, while I was listening to the strains of the halftime band drift over from our own local school on Friday evening.

Even so, I confessed God and the congregation during the prayers of the people, in the midst of all of the gun violence of this weekend the Jacksonville shooting stands out for its chilling hatred. Steeped in the blood of past victims and dragging injustice and prejudice with it like a standard, such ugliness pulls us back toward the history we hope so hard to escape.

I prayed, something like, Convert the hearts of this nation, O God. Subvert the forces of racism, hatred, violence, and evil. Help the broken, comfort the grief-stricken, stand close to those who are fearful, break open stony hearts, heal our hope.

Prayer, of course, does not alter the mind of God, who was anti-racist before we invented ways to shatter the image of God into pieces so that we could pick up an individual piece of mirror and call it whole, never mind that it cut us. Rather, I prayed it in order dimly to remember what I once heard God whisper to me: love wholly, trouble the demons, do not repay evil for evil, but overcome evil with good, with God, who alone is good, who alone is holy, who alone is whole.

From the cross we hear the incarnation of a sigh, Forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.

But don’t we?

Posted in current events, gun violence, prayer | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment